3.2 George Kelly
George Kelly is the founder of personal construct psychology. Although his writings are not quite as voluminous as those of most of the other theorists studied on this course, his style has been credited as appealing:
Let us then, instead of occupying ourselves with man-the-biological-organism or man-the-lucky-guy, have a look at man-the-scientist. (Kelly, 1955: 4)
Kelly proposes that we are all scientists, generating hypotheses, testing them against reality and revising them on the basis of their predictive accuracy.
Might not the individual man, each in his own personal way, assume more of the stature of a scientist, ever seeking to predict and control the course of events with which he is involved? (Kelly, 1955: 5)
A person is essentially her own theory constructor – ironically similar, in this respect, to the psychologists attempting to study her. The subject of psychological enquiry is equally capable of perceiving, categorising, construing and evaluating her own behaviour and of creating interpretations, abstractions and generalisations about herself, other people and the world.
In contrast to most psychodynamic theorists (see Chapter I), motivation is seen by Kelly as a redundant concept. Everyone is motivated “for no other reason than that he is alive” (Kelly, 1958: 49). Personality, similarly, is never actually defined in Kelly’s work, though might be regarded as the sum total of a person’s construct system. Personal constructs are delineated as a person’s ways of representing or viewing her own experiences. According to such a constructivist approach, there is no single absolute truth awaiting discovery, merely different ways of seeing and conceptualising events. Take the example of a child dropping and breaking his mother’s favourite ornament and subsequent potential subjective constructions of the objective situation (the broken ornament) from a variety of perspectives: “meanness” (the child’s mother), “carelessness” (the child’s father), “hostility” (psychoanalyst), “laziness” (the child’s teacher), “accident” (the child’s grandparents) or “stupidity” (the child himself). (The constructs themselves appear in inverted commas above. Constructs contain elements, namely the events, people and inanimate objects described or circumscribed.) Personal construct theory, therefore, strives to appreciate how a person sees and aligns events using his own concepts, criteria and dimensions.
Kelly’s central theme, or fundamental postulate, is reminiscent of Adler’s teleological orientation (see Section 1.1), with the whole personality organised around some final goal.
A person’s processes are psychologically channelised by the ways in which he anticipates events (Kelly, 1955: 46).
He also puts forward eleven corollaries regarding specific themes of construers, constructs and construct systems, as follows.
1) Construction corollary: “A person anticipates events by construing their replication” (Kelly, 1955: 50). Our anticipations concerning the nature of future events are based upon our interpretations of previous events.
2) Individuality corollary: “Persons differ from each other in their construction of events” (Kelly, 1955: 55). In deference to the phenomenological perspective of many humanistic-existential thinkers (see Section II), events are perceived in different ways by different people. This principle has clearly influenced Kelly’s assessment interview technique: “If you don’t know what is going on in a person’s mind, ask him; he may tell you!” (Kelly, 1958: 330), in response to which he adopts his characteristic credulous attitude, accepting the person’s statements at face value.
3) Organisation corollary: “Each person characteristically evolves, for his convenience in anticipating events, a construction system embracing ordinal relationships between constructs” (Kelly, 1955: 56). With a view to making prediction easier, a person’s idiosyncratic set of personal constructs is arranged hierarchically. A superordinate construct (e.g safe/dangerous) will subsume a number of subordinate constructs (e.g. good/bad, friend/foe).
4) Dichotomy corollary: “A person’s construction system is composed of a finite number of dichotomous constructs” (Kelly, 1955: 59). Sharing similar views to Jung and Perls, Kelly proposes that every personal construct must be specified in terms of two extremes. The opposite pole is always at least implicit. For example, good has no meaning without bad.
5) Choice corollary: “A person chooses for himself that alternative in a dichotomised construct through which he anticipates the greater possibility for extension and definition of his system” (Kelly, 1955: 64). The pole of a personal construct favoured by a person (e.g. trustworthy or untrustworthy) is that with the greatest predictive power for that person. Clearly, a difficulty may arise here through self-fulfilling prophecy.
6) Range corollary: “A construct is convenient for the anticipation of a finite range of events only” (Kelly, 1955: 68). The spectrum of usefulness of personal constructs varies from narrow to wide, but total encompassment of events can never be achieved. Again, the focus is upon utility for a particular person rather than objective truth.
7) Experience corollary: “A person’s construction system varies as he successively construes the replications of events” (Kelly, 1955: 72). Ideally, we revise our personal construct system on the basis of experience, updating and reforming on the basis of our constructs’ ability to anticipate events.
8) Modulation corollary: “The variation in a person’s construction system is limited by the permeability of the constructs within whose range of convenience the variants lie” (Kelly, 1955: 77). Some personal constructs are less permeable than others – less readily admitting new elements – thereby delimiting their potential for revision.
9) Fragmentation corollary: “A person may successively employ a variety of construction subsystems which are inferentially incompatible with each other” (Kelly, 1955: 83). At least somewhat contradictory subsystems of personal constructs may be tolerated and used at different times by the same person within her overall construct system. In a healthy personality, however, there is usually significant compatibility between constructs.
10) Commonality corollary: “To the extent that one person employs a construction of experience which is similar to that employed by another, his processes are psychologically similar to those of the other person” (Kelly, 1955: 90). The psychological similarity of people is reflected in the similarity of their personal constructs, which also facilitates empathy and liking.
11) Sociality corollary: “To the extent that one person construes the construction processes of another, he may play a role in a social process involving the other person” (Kelly, 1955: 96). Effective relating is dependent upon an understanding of others’ personal construct system. Misunderstandings and other communication difficulties are attributable to misperceptions of the other person’s construct system.
Notwithstanding Kelly’s limited coverage of developmental aspects, he sees personality as unfolding in a naturally healthy and continuous manner. A person is not bound by constructs developed at an earlier stage of life. The individual’s personal constructs become more permeable, less pre-emptive (prohibiting other constructs from applying to its elements) and, by definition, more propositional (not limiting other constructs from applying to its elements). Kelly considers the parents’ role as crucial. In particular, maladaptive parenting can potentially impair the child’s ability to anticipate the future. Overindulgence, for instance, leads the child to believe he can always satisfy every need. Pressure or punishment leads to the child clinging to a few familiar personal constructs rather than seeking new ways to interpret the environment. Erratic parental behaviour generates difficulties for the child to predict accurately and confidently. Negative evaluations from parents lead to the formation of corresponding personal constructs (e.g. “worthless”, “inadequate”) and a subordination of “self” to them. Specific psychopathology is also seen by Kelly in personal construct terms.
One prime Kellian antidote to psychological disturbance is constructive alternativism.
The events we face today are subject to as great a variety of constructions as our wits will enable us to contrive. . . . Even the most obvious occurrences of everyday life might appear utterly transformed if we were inventive enough to construe them differently. (Kelly, in Bannister [ed], 1970:1)
Hence, the person need never be a victim of childhood events, current circumstances or worries about the future. One is reminded of the existentialist Viktor Frankl’s reframing of his dreadful concentration camp experiences by finding meaning in suffering. Kelly recommends that reframing is assisted by the C-P-C cycle: circumspection, pre-emption, control/choice. The person construes a situation in different ways, selects only one construct for dealing with it, then chooses the pole of that construct that appears the more likely to predict accurately. Fixed-role therapy also encourages flexibility with a person’s construct system. Here, the individual, as perhaps advised by a personal construct psychotherapist, enacts in everyday life for a few weeks a role orthogonal to his self-characterisation (i.e. somewhere between how a person sees himself and its polar opposite; e.g. assertive rather than passive or aggressive). A person’s construct system itself is assessed and monitored through the cornerstonerepertory grid technique, where the nature, priority and arrangement of constructs may be abstracted from her descriptions of how two members (elements) of chosen triads of significant people (e.g. pooled from mother, father, most recent boyfriend, most successful person known personally, etc) are alike yet different from the third.
(Kelly has been a considerable influence on the cognitive approach, and on the psychotherapeutic work of Aaron Beck and Albert Ellis in particular. As the contributions of these two key figures in cognitive psychotherapy have relatively limited developmental focus and application, they are not included in this course, but are covered in depth [along with the allied topic of Neuro-Linguistic Programming] on Stage Three of the National College training.)
Bannister, D (ed) (1970). Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory. New York: Academic Press.
Kelly, G (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.
Kelly, G (1958). Man’s Construction of his Alternatives. In G Lindzey (ed),Assessment of Human Motives. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Kelly, G (1963). A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.
Kelly, G (1964). The Language of Hypotheses: Man’s Psychological Instrument.Journal of Individual Psychology, 20: 137-152.
Kelly, G (1965). A Threat of Aggression. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 5: 195-201.
Maher, B (ed) (1979). Clinical Psychology and Personality: The Selected Papers of George Kelly. Huntington, NY: Kreiger.
Here are some webpages:
We have been training professionals for 40 consecutive years (Longer than any other organisation in the UK). Many of the top therapists and trainers in the UK began their career at the National College.
Our complete Diploma Course is a genuine, validated post graduate programme (ADHP recipients are eligible for direct entry to the MA in Counselling and Psychotherapy Practice at Bath Spa University with 90 Credits APL).
We are 100% committed to the highest standards of training so that you are fully prepared for the challenges of professional practice
The National College is the only UK training organisation which is authorised the offer the European Certificate of Clinical Hypnosis through the European Association for Hypno-Psychotherapy. We are also one of only two European Accredited Psychotherapy Training Institutes with the European Association for Psychotherapy We should really be the International College of Hypnosis and Psychotherapy as we have graduates all over the world. We are an outward thinking organisation which looks out to the world for opportunities. Our Principal is the International Officer of UKCP and its representative to the Board of the EAP. We will continue to engage to ensure that our graduates have a future in a post-Brexit Europe.
Within the National College we have a philosophy that ensures that all tutors are full-time practitioners in addition to their training. By this we mean that they derive their primary income from seeing clients: this ensures that they "walk the walk" as well as "talk the talk". You will find that we often have examples of current clients to tell you about that illustrate theoretical points. There are some trainers who set up a school because they can't make it as practitioners. Would you want to be trained by them?
We believe it is vitally important that you see demonstrations of techniques and also get to practice. This gives you the confidence to practice with "real people" as soon as (if not before) you qualify. We say before, because you will be given permission to work with certain issues at certain points in your training. Not all trainers demonstrate, and not all give you a chance to practice and build your confidence.(ALL ours DO!)
On completion of the certificate course (stage two), graduates can join a range of professional bodies: the Complementary and Natural Healthcare Council (our regulator), the National Council for Hypnotherapy (a members’ co-operative with high standards, of which both our Principal and Managing Director are former chairs) and our own National Society of Hypnosis, Psychotherapy & Mindfulness. All you need to set up in professional practice with great support!
The National College course leads to registration with the UK Council for Psychotherapy; it is essential that important that your career is protected by being registered with a leading professional association like the UKCP (requirements for registration are laid out here). Our Managing Director is an Honorary Fellow of UKCP (approx. 1% of registrants) and is chair of the UKCP Education, Training and Practice Committee. Through this link you can be sure that we keep at the forefront of all developments in the field.
We believe in creating a friendly learning environment in which students feel safe to express themselves and learn while building supportive peer relationships with fellow students.
All our tutors are experienced teachers, as well as being, themselves, National College trained and experienced practitioners. We have made it policy that all tutors have to demonstrate training in diversity.
Support from a long established well-staffed organisation throughout not only your training but also your whole career!
We actively enforce equal opportunities and other policies
We believe the learning environment should be a safe, confidential and supportive space for all learners. For this reason we are committed to actively enforcing all our equal opportunities policies by making reasonable adjustments for any of the legally defined protected characteristics. An example of a reasonable adjustment would be agreeing to allow a student with dyslexia to provide portfolio evidence in recorded rather than written form if they needed to do so.
We encourage students to ask questions or make comments about the training at any stage and will do our best to meet your needs. There is a student representative on the Academic Board.
Ethical considerations are all important in a field where one is working with vulnerable people. We cover these in depth. Check with other schools as to which, if any, code of ethics they subscribe. They should be bound by a training code of ethics as well as teaching you one for practice.
The National College embraces modern technology; we provide our materials on a Kindle so that you have all that you need at your fingertips. Additionally, we are one of the first institutes in our field to use "online directed learning" as part of our advanced training.
We know that you want to know exactly what you will be learning, so we publish all the details of the structure of our courses including detailed learning outcomes. We also publish our external accreditation reports from UKCP, you can read our latest one here We want you to be sure you have made the right choice!
We train small groups of students, which we believe is important so that you get individual attention. Some schools have as many as 50 students in a class! We are also not limited to training in one location. We currently run courses in London, Manchester, Oxford and East Midlands (Leicester) in the UK and the Gold Coast (Australia) and Phoenix Arizona (USA)
Past students are welcome to re-attend any stage of their training FREE OF CHARGE (subject to available space) in the ten years following their primary training. This is just one of the ways we support our students. We believe that we are the only school of our type to offer this opportunity free of charge.
National College Hypnosis Training and Hypnotherapy Training courses adhere to the National Occupational Standards for Hypnotherapy (the Principal and Managing Director were members of the working group who wrote these), and incorporate and Professional Occupational Standards produced by UKCP.
We do not take just anyone onto our courses. You will be interviewed to ensure that you are suitable for this profession of working with vulnerable people, and, very importantly, to ensure that the National College is right for you. If we feel that another course would be better for you (and this does happen), we will tell you, and advise you of who to approach.
Therapy is an "individual" process: we will encourage you to find your own way to be the best therapist you can be.
Our course also includes business/practice management. So often hypnotherapists and psychotherapists fall at the first hurdle because, while they may be wonderful at what they do, they don't know how to get the clients. The National College has a great depth of knowledge and experience in this area that you can draw on. All our tutors around the country are willing to share with you what works and what doesn't so that you can learn from our successes, and our mistakes!
Our complete Diploma Course is a genuine, validated post graduate programme (ADHP recipients are eligible for direct entry to the MA in Counselling and Psychotherapy Practice at Bath Spa University with 90 Credits APL.